The New Kind of Technocracy To Be Learned

Caveat: The purpose of this series is neither to proclaim myself as a grammarian nor to despise people who are still unfamiliar with common grammar mistakes. It is to serve as a reminder that there are rules in English that refute those mistakes. I am well aware that I still have a lot to learn in English and I will not stop digging those rules to share them here. If you happen to be a guilty party, please remember that I shared these blog posts in the spirit of constructive criticism.

My interest in the standard usage of English has become somewhat espousal since I entered the academe and the stenographer’s world in 2009. The interest and the espousal spiked up when I started working outside my home country in 2012. It was there that I noticed the nuances, subtleties, unique lunacy (‘English Is Crazy’ Poem Proves The English Language Makes No Sense Whatsoever and “Linguistic Humor, The English Lesson”), and the seductive power of the English language even more.

I never got more hooked into digging the language until I interacted with the Definitely Filipino blog’s subscribers and commenters and the blog’s fans (2.9 million and counting) on their Facebook page. I got such an overwhelming reception from them when my first three articles got published. Gleaning from their reactions on the articles, I realized one thing. We, Filipinos, are indeed sensitive to articles that compromise the validity of our very own Philippine English. The views, likes, shares, and comments found on the blog and their Facebook page though proved that we take them as mere constructive criticisms at the end of the day. Moreover, their questions and corrections are without a doubt informative not only to the attentive public but to me. To prove my point, there were actually new grammar rules (e.g., like does not introduce examples and when using “such as” to introduce examples—always precede the last item with “and” or “or”; never end the list with “etc.’ or “and so forth”) that I learned from them. Click here if you want to read the whole discussion thread.

See, all the articles in this, I may say, series were inspired by the readers’ suggestions and thought-provoking questions and the common grammar pet peeves I hear and see around of course. So I would like to give time to answer two stirring questions from Ms. Joy in the comment section of the article “’Masteral’ and Some Very Common Filipino Concoctions.”

1. In a different perspective, how can we translate our English competency into the economic status of our country?

2. Is it the English proficiency of the Japanese people that sets them where they are economically?

Let me start by saying our competency in Business English has persuaded BPO companies to move their base from India to the Philippines. In an article titled “The Philippines has become the call-center capital of the world” published on the Los Angeles Times’ website last 01 February 2015, experts estimate that the country’s BPO industry will generate an astounding $25 billion in revenue, accounting for about 10% of the Philippines’ economy and as much as the total amount expected to be sent home by 11 million Filipinos working overseas. The industry has helped boost our country’s economy into one of the region’s fastest-growing. The outsourcing boom has, beyond question, spawned the bustling business districts in the metropolis with skyscrapers and 24-hour buffets and condos that sell for $500,000. I am no economist but I could see those figures mentioned sending massive thanks to our English competency.

As to the second question, I do not believe that English proficiency can set any country economically as English is definitely not the only essential key to economic prosperity. Most of the first world countries such as China and Russia are not English-speaking but their peoples have strong commitment to their national integrity systems (e.g., anti-corruption), advanced technology, well-managed resources, among other things that propel their respective economic statuses. It does not guarantee progress for a country but it would be useful—and helpful like in the current state of our country’s economy as explained earlier.

It should be noted that the main reason why I (and the rest of the English language’s concerned citizens) write articles like this is to just let the attentive and inattentive public know the differences between Standard English, Non-Standard English, and Philippine English.

It is true that there is a place and time for everything. However, when it comes to professionalism, there should be no substitute for proper grammar there.

Just like what I said in the article titled “Filipino Concoctions, Philippine English, and Standard American English“, most of the grammar pet peeves I have presented in this humble series are accepted in Philippine English regardless of their grammatical quirks. In the end though, they will remain as mere parts of this English variant in the region. When it comes to the three major English proficiency exams (Test of English as a Foreign Language [TOEFL], International English Language Testing System [IELTS], and the hot of the press Pearson Test of English, Academic [PTEA]), Standard English sets the record straight not the English variants nor the Non-Standard English. Therefore, the grammatical pet peeves on the list remain incorrect and should be really avoided, especially by those who aspire to join the global workforce.

Always remember, knowledge of the English language (i.e., good grammar) is necessary no matter what your career is. A number of studies have been conducted to validate probable career advancement for those who have superior knowledge of the English language. These studies have also demonstrated that a strong command of the English language will lead to higher paying jobs, more social mobility, and a great deal of social success. I am not saying though that it is an absolute prerequisite for a successful career. I know that there are people who are very good in grammar but when it comes to dexterity in practical works, they are incompetent.

I would like to reiterate that for us Filipinos, it takes a certain amount of determination to be exceptionally good in English because it is just our second language. It is a given that not all Filipinos can speak and write English correctly. Learning English as a subject in school is definitely not enough. We need to accept related corrections and treat English as a working language and a means of communication on a global scale (i.e., in accordance with Standard English). We should also consider better ways to learn it because, whether we like it or not, English is the new kind of technocracy to be learned; one reason it has become an international standard.

I am fervently hoping that all the readers who followed the articles published on this blog site get to read this one, for them to understand better where I am coming from not just because I am a teacher.

Related Articles

Accent’ matters: Philippines acquiring 70% of India call centers  at

Global Business Speaks English at

Does Grammar Matter in the Workplace? at

6 Comments Add yours

  1. Mabel Kwong says:

    This is an interesting article on English and its variants, Sony. “Standard English sets the record straight” That is so true. Variants of English, as you said, Filipino English or Singlish/Singapore or Chinglish/China, are often seen as colloquial speak – especially when spoken in front of Westerners or those who abide by the (Westernised) standards of English. To me, there seems to be a sort of hierarchy going on here.

    Sure, not everyone uses the English language to communicate and do business everyday. Being bilingual is often an asset. However, at the end of the day, English still seems to be the language most of us gravitate to when we try to talk to someone of a different background than us.


    1. Sony Fugaban says:

      The only problem I see is that when you present an English word like “master’s” that is not recognized in Philippine English (PE), you will become the one who is wrong not to mention subject of verbal ridicule. It is because we were lead to believe that “masteral” is an English word. The same holds true for other words, verb phrases, and idioms that are not standard in usage but are widely used in schools and national TV.

      So when you say something standard like “pronunciation” (pronounciation in PE) or “with regard to” (with regards to in PE), common people will show reluctance or raise eyebrows. We, Filipinos, in general are not receptive to corrections to what we’ve gotten used to.

      We are the country to beat though in Business English.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Well said, Sonny!

    I, too, have some articles published in Definitely Filipino’s website. 🙂

    It’s definitely important for us to learn the English language for us to be considered as “Global Pinoys.” Here’s a related blog post I wrote about its importance, “Bakit Dapat Matuto ng English” >>

    By the way, I got a score of “7 = Good English Language User” for IELTS, and I am also TESOL-certified. 😉 But no, I haven’t arrived yet, and I’m still a “work in progress” when it comes to my English fluency.

    All the best to you and your wonderful blog!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Sony Fugaban says:

      I couldn’t be happier to know you’re with me in this endeavor, Adrian.

      Three cheers for your high grades in those English tests. I haven’t taken any major English exams other than the ones at school.

      I need to read what’s in the link now. Thanks for sharing it.


      I’m also a work in progress. I’m still studying the language each time I write (during leisure times as well).

      Liked by 1 person

  3. I love it when people come together and share opinions, great blog, keep it up.


Feedback is most welcome!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s